What is a Minor Variance?

Icon of a light bulb with rays indicating illumination, set against a dark gray circular background.

Quick Answer

A minor variance is an approval that allows a property to vary from a specific requirement of the municipal zoning by-law when the proposed development does not fully comply with the existing zoning standards.

Key Takeaways

Where does it fit?

Flowchart showing the land development process, with steps: Official Plan, Zoning By-Law, Minor Variance, Building Permit, Construction. Each step includes a description explaining its purpose.

Full Explaination

A minor variance is a planning approval that allows a property owner to seek relief from a specific requirement of the municipal zoning by-law.

Zoning by-laws establish detailed rules for how properties can be used and developed, including requirements for setbacks, building height, lot coverage, parking, and other standards. Sometimes a proposed development generally complies with the intent of the zoning but cannot meet one or more of these specific requirements.

In these circumstances, the property owner may be able to apply for a minor variance rather than a zoning by-law amendment.

Approval is not automatic. In Ontario, every minor variance must satisfy the four tests established under the Planning Act.

What Can a Minor Variance Address?

Minor variance applications commonly request relief from development standards such as:

  • Minimum front, rear, or side yard setbacks

  • Maximum building height

  • Maximum lot coverage

  • Minimum landscaped open space

  • Parking requirements

  • Minimum lot frontage or lot area

  • Accessory building or structure requirements

The specific regulations vary between municipalities and zoning by-laws.

A minor variance generally provides relief from particular zoning provisions rather than replacing the zoning that applies to the property.

The Four Tests

Under Ontario's Planning Act, a minor variance must satisfy four tests.

1. Does it maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan?

The proposal should remain consistent with the broader planning policies and objectives established for the property and surrounding area.

2. Does it maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law?

Even though the proposal does not meet a specific zoning requirement, it should continue to respect the underlying purpose of that requirement.

3. Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land?

The Committee considers whether the requested variance represents an appropriate form of development for the property and its context.

4. Is the variance minor in nature?

“Minor” does not simply mean small.

A variance may involve a relatively small numerical change but still create significant impacts. Conversely, a larger numerical difference may be considered minor depending on the circumstances.

The significance of the variance is considered in relation to the property, surrounding area, and potential impacts.

All four tests must be satisfied for a minor variance to be approved.

Who Decides?

Minor variance applications are generally considered by a municipality's Committee of Adjustment.

The Committee is an independent decision-making body appointed by municipal Council.

Before a decision is made, the application is circulated for review and notice is provided in accordance with the Planning Act. Municipal departments, agencies, neighbours, and other interested parties may have an opportunity to provide comments.

The Committee considers the application, applicable planning policies, staff and agency comments, public input, and the four tests before making its decision.

A decision may approve the variance, refuse it, or approve it subject to conditions.

Real World Example

A residential addition that does not meet the reuqired side yard setback

Proposed new backyard deck with black metal railing and outdoor dining set, located adjacent to a beige brick house with a green fence on the left side, green grass, trees in the background, and sunlight in a suburban neighborhood.
A small backyard with a grassy area, wooden fence on the left, and beige brick house on the right. There is a diagram marking a 1.2 meter side yard setback in the yard. Trees and neighboring houses are visible in the background.

A homeowner wants to construct a deck beside their house. The zoning by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres, but the proposed addition would be located 0.6 metres from the property line.

The proposed residential use is already permitted. The issue is that the addition does not meet one of the zoning by-law’s development standards.

The homeowner could therefore apply for a minor variance to reduce the required side yard setback from 1.2 metres to 0.6 metres.

The Committee of Adjustment would consider the request against the four tests under the Planning Act. The fact that the requested change is only 0.6 metres does not, on its own, determine whether the variance is “minor.” The potential impact and the context of the property also matter.

The key takeaway: A minor variance does not change the underlying zoning or permit an entirely new use. In this example, the residential use is already permitted—the applicant is seeking relief from one specific zoning standard.

Note: This example is for illustration only. Every minor variance application is evaluated on its own merits and must satisfy the four tests under Ontario's Planning Act.

Frequently Asked Questions